What does it say about Obama haters when the only thing they can think of to attack is his teleprompter?

Eight of the last 20 questions in this section ridicule Obama for relying on a teleprompter, even though each of the last 10 Presidents did the same thing.



Doesn't this demonstrate that Obama-haters have run out of steam?What does it say about Obama haters when the only thing they can think of to attack is his teleprompter?
It's terrible!!! How can we withstand the onslaught!!!!





IT'S LIKE BEING WHIPPED WITH A PIECE OF SPAGHETTI!!
UGH...I was thinking the same thing. Seems like a bunch of 14 year olds just hijacked the section.





ok...i can understand people being upset about his inability to not use the teleprompter but is that really the issue here? I can think of a lot more important ones... besides doesnt everyone use one?What does it say about Obama haters when the only thing they can think of to attack is his teleprompter?
No doubt that it is a very thin argument. However, Obama should wean himself off of relying on it too much.
Oh baby, it's much more than that. Haven't you ever been so disgusted with something that all you could get out was gibberish?



Well... that is where we are.



I was disgusted under Bush. Truly disgusted. But, that pales in comparison to what I feel now.What does it say about Obama haters when the only thing they can think of to attack is his teleprompter?
As someone who generally disagrees with what Obama does, I have never attacked his teleprompter.....but I can guess that others that do are simply doing it because it's nearly impossible to have an intelligent debate that includes facts and history with a lot of Obama's supporters. Or maybe they are just on the same intelligence level as the Obama supporters who can only claim a person is racist or a sore loser when that person presents negative facts about Obama.
wake up, you must be dreaming...the "Obamanator" is an idiot and a very, very DANGEROUS and INEXPERIENCED one at that..
Desperation...Bush used index cards....maybe he should have used a teleprompter, because he came off like a bumbling idiot
What is great is that my questions did just what I wanted them to do.
Yes, they will just keep going on, hating and wasting away their negative energy. Complainers never get things done or move in a positive direction.

It's quite immature.
No it does not. It proves the teleprompter schtik is convenient.



The Democrats are in bed with AIG:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090318/ap_o鈥?/a>



"Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Ron Wyden, D-Ore., won passage of a provision earlier this year that they said would have prevented the type of payments now at the center of a storm.



It was dropped without explanation in the final compromise on the economic stimulus measure, replaced by a less restrictive set of conditions backed by Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and accepted by the White House. "



AIG (2008 Political contributions)

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.p鈥?/a>

Dodd, Chris (D-CT) Senate $103,100

Obama, Barack (D-IL) Senate $101,332

McCain, John (R-AZ) Senate $59,499

Clinton, Hillary (D-NY) Senate $35,965

Baucus, Max (D-MT) Senate $24,750

Romney, Mitt (R) Pres $20,850

Biden, Joseph R Jr (D-DE) Senate $19,975





Obama bullsh*t timeline:



He campaigned on no lobbyists being in his administration.

(Sept 2008)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkSMt4StB鈥?/a> (2 min.....you have GOT to watch this!!!!!!!!!!!!)



He then said he would bend the rules so they could be on his "transition team":



http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articl鈥?/a> (Nov 2008)



He then proceeded to hire lobbyists:



http://www.dcexaminer.com/politics/Obama鈥?/a> (Feb 25)



"Leibowitz would join at least 14 other lobbyists hired or nominated to executive branch positions by Obama."



AFTER he got all the lobbyists he wanted in place, he gave a speech about NO MORE LOBBYISTS............



http://themoderatevoice.com/26797/obama-鈥?/a> (Feb 28)



But now apparently he needs a few more: (March 11)

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009鈥?/a>

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/11/morn鈥?/a>

http://www.smartbrief.com/news/100days/s鈥?/a>



ON TO EARMARKS....



He said, while president elect, he would limit "wasteful spending" in govt.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0bhGXpIw鈥?/a> (Nov 2008)



He then went on to sign a massive "stimulus" bill filled with pork......followed by another $400 billion spending bill with thousands of earmarks. (Feb/Mar 2009)



THE DAY AFTER SIGNING THE SPENDING BILL he gives a speech on "reforming" the process by which earmarks are added and passed............LOL



http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/11/o鈥?/a> (Mar 2009)
A Blunt a day,

Is enough they say,

to wipe one's memory,

all away.



We're just getting started!